Skip to content

Azure Local Distributed Application design ​

The Azure Local SCOM product ships its own Distributed Application. It does not reference the Hyper-V MP or any shared runtime library.

The root class is HybridSolutionsCloud.AzureLocal.Service, as accepted in ADR 0034. It extends Microsoft.SystemCenter.Service and represents one monitored Azure Local deployment. Its purpose is to answer one operator question: Is this Azure Local deployment healthy?

Service model ​

DA branchMembershipRollup intent
ComputeCluster service, node membership, quorum, CPU, and memoryCompute and cluster-coordination health
StorageHealth Service faults, pools, volumes/CSVs, and physical disksStorage availability, configuration, capacity, and root-cause health
NetworkNetwork ATC intent statusHost-network intent convergence and configuration health
Azure integrationLocal registration state and locally installed Arc/MOC platform servicesThe node-side Azure integration boundary; Azure resource health remains outside this MP
LifecycleLocally observable solution-update stateReadiness and active-update health
Monitoring pipelineSCOM agents, management-server probes, discovery freshness, and required collection paths from ADR 0018Independent pipeline health so stale green infrastructure cannot hide failed monitoring

The DA instance and component membership are authored in Management Pack XML and populated through typed discoveries and stable relationship keys. Customers do not have to maintain membership in the SCOM Distributed Application Designer.

Health propagation ​

The DA organizes health; it does not replace entity monitoring.

LayerResponsibility
Unit monitorsEstablish health for an Azure Local entity or signal
Aggregate monitorsRoll Availability, Configuration, Performance, and applicable Security state within an entity
Dependency monitorsPropagate health through discovered platform relationships and into each DA component group
DA rootPresents the deployment-level service state across the component groups

ADR 0003 governs worst-state defaults and approved exceptions. ADR 0018 requires the monitoring-pipeline branch to participate directly at the root. Unknown, stale-data, maintenance-mode, and recovery behavior must be validated rather than allowed to resolve silently to Healthy.

Required product artifacts ​

  • DA root and six component-group class definitions in the Azure Local Library MP;
  • dynamic relationship and membership discoveries;
  • aggregate and dependency monitors with upgrade-safe overrides where supported;
  • Health Explorer, diagram, state, alert, and task views scoped to the deployment;
  • optional report and service-level objective targeting for availability and selected performance rules;
  • optional SquaredUp Dashboard Server views that target the Azure Local DA; and
  • import, population, fault, recovery, upgrade, coexistence, and removal tests.

The health and alert architecture is the current visual and behavioral reference. The DA, component relationships, domain aggregates, and dependency monitors are authored in the functional development baseline; SCOM lab validation remains outstanding.

Boundaries ​

  • The DA monitors Azure Local infrastructure, not guest operating systems or applications.
  • A deployment failure does not roll into a Hyper-V DA.
  • A combined Azure Local and Hyper-V estate view requires a future optional integration MP.
  • DA membership and rollup changes are public behavior and follow the product's versioning and upgrade contract.

References ​

Released under the MIT License.